<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bryan Anderson - Food Liability Law Blog</title>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/bryan-anderson.html</link>
<description>Bryan Anderson is an associate in the Litigation Group. He has broad experience in many types of products liability, commercial and appellate matters for pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer financial services clients. Bryan is also an experienced commercial litigator, defending against business torts and handling disputes relating to intellectual property, trade secrets and contracts.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:45:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:54:13 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Bottled Water Association Sues Over Water Bottle Ads</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="169" alt="" hspace="2" width="250" align="right" vspace="2" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/Plastic Water Bottles.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.bottledwater.org/default.htm"><font color="#800080">International Bottled Water Association (IBWA)</font></a> is taking aim at an advertising campaign for <a href="http://ecocanteen.org/"><font color="#800080">Eco Canteen</font></a> stainless steel water bottles, claiming the ads wrongly suggest that plastic water bottles are unhealthy and unsafe.<br />
<br />
In a lawsuit filed in the <a href="http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina</font></a>, IBWA claims that Eco Canteen&rsquo;s television ads and content on various Eco Canteen websites deceive the public into believing that single-serve and reusable plastic water bottles constitute a safety and health risk to consumers.&nbsp;Among other things, IBWA&rsquo;s lawsuit alleges that some of Eco Canteen&rsquo;s ads have:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Improperly linked plastic water bottles to breast and prostate cancer and stated that plastic water bottles &ldquo;could be poisoning you and your family&rdquo;;<br />
    &nbsp;</li>
    <li>Matched images of single-serve plastic water bottles with Eco Canteen&rsquo;s claims &ldquo;relating to an organic compound called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A"><font color="#800080">Bisphenol A (BPA)</font></a> with the intent to confuse consumers into believing that single-serve bottles also contain BPA even though they do not&rdquo;;<br />
    &nbsp;</li>
    <li>Conveyed false and misleading information regarding the alleged health risks of BPA; and<br />
    &nbsp;</li>
    <li>Suggested that exposing certain water bottles to warm temperatures can lead to leaching of chemicals.<br />
    &nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>IBWA brings two claims against Eco Canteen: (i) a false advertising claim under the Lanham Act, <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1125.html"><font color="#800080">15 U.S.C. &sect;&nbsp;1125</font></a>; and (ii) an unfair competition claim under North Carolina law.&nbsp;A copy of the complaint (including exhibits showing some of the Eco Canteen ads about which IBWA complains) is available <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/IBWA - Eco Canteen Complaint.pdf">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/07/articles/litigation-2/bottled-water-association-sues-over-water-bottle-ads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/07/articles/litigation-2/bottled-water-association-sues-over-water-bottle-ads/</guid>
<category>BPA</category><category>Bisphenol A</category><category>Eco Canteen</category><category>IBWA</category><category>International Bottled Water Association</category><category>Lanham Act</category><category>Litigation</category><category>North Carolina</category><category>U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina</category><category>ads</category><category>advertisements</category><category>advertising</category><category>bottle</category><category>breast cancer</category><category>cancer</category><category>competition</category><category>complaint</category><category>deceive</category><category>deception</category><category>false</category><category>false advertising</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>misleading</category><category>online</category><category>plastic</category><category>poison</category><category>prostate cancer</category><category>stainless steel</category><category>television</category><category>unfair</category><category>unfair competition</category><category>unhealthy</category><category>unsafe</category><category>water</category><category>water bottle</category><category>water bottles</category><category>website</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:45:45 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>2010 Food Safety Education Conference Announced</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Agriculture&rsquo;s Food Safety and Inspection Service has announced the 2010 Food Safety Education Conference.&nbsp;The conference will be held in Atlanta from March 23 through 26, 2010.&nbsp;Although the agenda is still a work in progress, you can expect sessions on foodborne illnesses, outreach to the medical community, food safety education initiatives, social marketing, and emerging industry trends and technologies.<br />
<br />
The conference is accepting abstracts on food safety-related topics through August 16, 2009.&nbsp;More information on the conference and the abstract submission process is available through the links on the widget below.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">var gadget_width=188;</script><script src="http://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_&amp;_events/fsec_widget/widget.js"></script>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/07/articles/upcoming-events/2010-food-safety-education-conference-announced/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/07/articles/upcoming-events/2010-food-safety-education-conference-announced/</guid>
<category>Atlanta</category><category>Conference</category><category>Department of Agriculture</category><category>FSIS</category><category>Food Safety Education Conference</category><category>Technology</category><category>USDA</category><category>Upcoming Events</category><category>abstract</category><category>food safety</category><category>food safety and inspection service</category><category>foodborne illness</category><category>social marketing</category><category>technologies</category><category>trends</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:27:16 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Energy Drink Maker Sued Over Alleged Health Risks</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The maker of <a href="http://www.redlinerush.com/"><font color="#800080">Redline</font></a> energy drinks has been sued in federal court in California.&nbsp; The plaintiff, Zack Aaronson, is seeking class action status for his lawsuit against <a href="http://www.vpxsports.com/our-company/default.aspx"><font color="#800080">Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</font></a> (operating under the trademark VPX).<br />
<br />
The plaintiff claims that VPX failed to adequately warn consumers of potential side effects and health risks associated with consuming VPX&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.vpxsports.com/sports-nutrition-supplements/fat-loss-energy/redline-rtd.aspx"><font color="#800080">Redline energy products</font></a>.&nbsp; Among other things, the plaintiff alleges that consumers have reported adverse side effects including chills, excessive sweating, vomiting, convulsions, chest pains, and rapid heartbeat.<br />
<br />
According to <a href="http://www.vpxsports.com/default.aspx"><font color="#800080">VPX&rsquo;s website</font></a>, Redline is available as energy drinks and gel caps.&nbsp; The company touts the products as &ldquo;the first physique-transforming matrix to coax your body to burn fat through the &lsquo;shivering response.&rsquo;&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The case is <i>Aaronson v. Vital Pharmacetucals, Inc.</i>, S.D. Cal. Case No. 09-1333.&nbsp; A copy of the complaint is available <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/Aaronson v  Vital Pharmaceuticals complaint.pdf">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/06/articles/litigation-2/energy-drink-maker-sued-over-alleged-health-risks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/06/articles/litigation-2/energy-drink-maker-sued-over-alleged-health-risks/</guid>
<category>Aaronson</category><category>Energy</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Redline</category><category>VPX</category><category>Vital Pharmaceuticals</category><category>Zack Aaronson</category><category>class action</category><category>drink</category><category>energy drink</category><category>fat</category><category>health risks</category><category>risks</category><category>side effects</category><category>warn</category><category>warnings</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:41:23 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>FDA Warning to General Mills: Cheerios is a Drug</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="226" alt="" width="200" align="left" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/Cheerios.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</font></a> is taking issue with claims that <a href="http://www.cheerios.com/"><font color="#800080">Cheerios cereal</font></a> can lower <a href="http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1516">cholesterol</a>.<br />
<br />
In a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s7188c.htm"><font color="#800080">letter</font></a> to <a href="http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/index.aspx"><font color="#800080">General Mills</font></a>, the FDA says that statements made on Cheerios packaging like the claim that the cereal is &ldquo;clinically proven to help lower cholesterol&rdquo; make the product a drug under federal law.&nbsp;The agency suggests that General Mills should file a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/CDER/REGULATORY/APPLICATIONS/nda.htm"><font color="#800080">new drug application</font></a> with the FDA if it wants to keep making these claims on Cheerios boxes.&nbsp;The FDA also noted concerns with statements made on a <a href="http://www.eatbetteramerica.com/wholegrainnation/"><font color="#800080">General Mills-sponsored website</font></a> regarding the benefits of eating whole grains.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124216077825612187.html"><font color="#800080">Wall Street Journal is reporting</font></a> that a General Mills spokesperson said the company will work with the FDA to reach a resolution regarding Cheerios labeling.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/crisis-management/fda-warning-to-general-mills-cheerios-is-a-drug/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/crisis-management/fda-warning-to-general-mills-cheerios-is-a-drug/</guid>
<category>Cheerios</category><category>Crisis Management</category><category>Drug</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>General Mills</category><category>cholesterol</category><category>claims</category><category>fda</category><category>labeling</category><category>new drug application</category><category>packaging</category><category>statements</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>whole grains</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:25:26 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>FDA Seeks Largest Budget Increase in Agency&apos;s History</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a> is seeking to increase its budget for Fiscal Year 2010 by nearly 20 percent more than FY 2009 &ndash; to $3.2 billion.&nbsp;The <a href="http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/budget2010/agency_by_agency_050709.html?hpid=moreheadlines"><font color="#800080">Washington Post reports</font></a> that the increase is the largest in the agency&rsquo;s history.<br />
<br />
The FDA&rsquo;s spending request includes $259.3 million to be devoted to the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2009/NEW02013.html"><font color="#800080">&ldquo;Protecting America&rsquo;s Food Supply&rdquo; initiative</font></a>.&nbsp;The agency plans to, among other things, strengthen the safety and security of the food supply chain, increase food inspections, and reinspect food facilities that fail to meet FDA&rsquo;s safety standards.&nbsp;The <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g9jw7mifb4aXLy0XoxMpyZGeDPCQD981K2882"><font color="#800080">Associated Press reports</font></a> that the FDA&rsquo;s proposed budget would put 222 more food inspectors in the field, for a total of 1,022.&nbsp;A summary of the FDA&rsquo;s FY&nbsp;2010 budget is available <a href="http://www.fda.gov/oc/factsheets/budget2010.html"><font color="#800080">here</font></a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/legislation-2/fda-seeks-largest-budget-increase-in-agencys-history/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/legislation-2/fda-seeks-largest-budget-increase-in-agencys-history/</guid>
<category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Protecting America</category><category>Supply&apos;</category><category>associated press</category><category>budget</category><category>fda</category><category>food</category><category>inspections</category><category>inspectors</category><category>s</category><category>safety</category><category>safety standards</category><category>standards</category><category>washington post</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:48:49 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Judge Denies Class Action Status in McDonald&apos;s French Fry and Hash Brown Litigation</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="167" alt="" hspace="0" width="250" align="right" border="2" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/French Fries.bmp" />A lawsuit claiming that <a href="http://www.mcdonalds.com/"><font color="#800080">McDonald&rsquo;s</font></a> deceived the public about ingredients in its french fries and hash browns will not proceed as a class action.&nbsp;A federal judge in Chicago has denied the plaintiffs&rsquo; motion for class certification, characterizing the proposed class and subclasses as &ldquo;too indefinite and overbroad.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
According to the <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/In re McDonalds Opinion 05062009.pdf">court&rsquo;s opinion</a>, the potato suppliers who provide McDonald&rsquo;s with its french fries and hash browns par-fry the potatoes in oil made of 99 percent vegetable oil and one percent natural beef flavor.&nbsp;The beef flavor is partly made from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bran"><font color="#800080">wheat bran</font></a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casein"><font color="#800080">casein</font></a> (a dairy product).&nbsp;McDonald&rsquo;s restaurants then fry the potatoes in 100% vegetable oil prior to serving the products to customers.&nbsp;Plaintiffs allege that McDonald&rsquo;s falsely claimed its french fries and hash browns were <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten"><font color="#800080">gluten</font></a>, wheat, and dairy-free.&nbsp;They say that they never would have purchased the potato products if they knew that the fries and hash browns were partially fried in oil containing wheat bran and casein.&nbsp;McDonald&rsquo;s corrected its disclosure in 2006.<br />
<br />
The plaintiffs proposed a class consisting of all persons residing in the United States who purchased McDonald&rsquo;s french fries or hash browns between February 2002 and February 2006 and who, at the time of purchase, had been diagnosed with <a href="http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/celiac/"><font color="#800080">celiac disease</font></a>, <a href="http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition=galactosemia"><font color="#800080">galactosemia</font></a>, <a href="http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/autism/detail_autism.htm"><font color="#800080">autism</font></a>, and/or <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/wheat-allergy/DS01002"><font color="#800080">wheat</font></a>, <a href="http://www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/celiac-disease/features/gluten-intolerance-against-grain"><font color="#800080">gluten</font></a>, or <a href="http://www.healthscout.com/ency/68/502/main.html"><font color="#800080">dairy allergies</font></a>.<br />
<br />
In rejecting class certification, <a href="http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/JudgeInfo.aspx"><font color="#800080">U.S. District Judge Elaine Bucklo</font></a> noted that none of the plaintiffs has suffered any physical injury from eating the potato products; indeed, she noted that &ldquo;plaintiffs testified in their depositions that they were quite satisfied with the Potato Products they consumed.&rdquo;&nbsp;Additionally, Judge Bucklo noted that proving economic damage would be an &ldquo;evidentiary headache&rdquo; because the court would be required to review potentially millions of letters proving plaintiffs&rsquo; medical diagnoses and the damage to each potential class member would be nominal: between $1.00 and $1.50.&nbsp;Finally, the court ruled a nationwide class action would be unmanageable because state laws at issue in the case vary too much to apply to plaintiffs from across the country.<br />
<br />
The case is <i>In re McDonald&rsquo;s French Fries Litigation</i>, MDL No. 1784.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/litigation-2/judge-denies-class-action-status-in-mcdonalds-french-fry-and-hash-brown-litigation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/litigation-2/judge-denies-class-action-status-in-mcdonalds-french-fry-and-hash-brown-litigation/</guid>
<category>Bucklo</category><category>Chicago</category><category>Disease</category><category>Elaine</category><category>Elaine Bucklo</category><category>Litigation</category><category>McDonald</category><category>U.S. District Court</category><category>U.S. District Judge</category><category>allergies</category><category>allergy</category><category>autism</category><category>bran</category><category>casein</category><category>celiac</category><category>celiac disease</category><category>class action</category><category>class certification</category><category>dairy</category><category>dairy product</category><category>dairy-free</category><category>federal court</category><category>federal judge</category><category>french fries</category><category>galactosemia</category><category>gluten</category><category>hash browns</category><category>ingredients</category><category>multidistrict litigation</category><category>potato</category><category>potatoes</category><category>s&apos;</category><category>wheat</category><category>wheat bran</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:15:54 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>FDA Commissioner Nominee Faces Confirmation Hearing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/changingthefaceofmedicine/physicians/biography_136.html"><font color="#800080">Dr. Margaret Hamburg</font></a>, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/"><font color="#800080">President Barack Obama&rsquo;s</font></a> nominee to oversee the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/"><font color="#800080">Food and Drug Administration</font></a>, is appearing before a <a href="http://www.senate.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Senate</font></a> committee this afternoon regarding her nomination.&nbsp;The confirmation hearing before the <a href="http://help.senate.gov/"><font color="#800080">Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee</font></a> began at 2:00 p.m. ET.&nbsp;Streaming video is available <a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_05_07_b/2009_05_07_b.html"><font color="#800080">here</font></a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gsvZsar_LKBgcAJwEkEjRDcndNsAD981G1H82"><font color="#800080">The Associated Press is reporting</font></a> that, if confirmed, one of Hamburg&rsquo;s first tasks will be overseeing development of a vaccine for the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/"><font color="#800080">H1N1 influenza virus</font></a>.&nbsp;In Hamburg&rsquo;s <a href="http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2009_05_07_b/Hamburg.pdf">opening remarks</a> to the Senate committee that were made available to reporters earlier today, she also noted that food safety will be among her top priorities.&nbsp;&ldquo;Important steps must be taken to better protect the nation&rsquo;s food supply from farm to form,&rdquo; Hamburg said.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/upcoming-events/fda-commissioner-nominee-faces-confirmation-hearing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/05/articles/upcoming-events/fda-commissioner-nominee-faces-confirmation-hearing/</guid>
<category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>H1N1</category><category>H1N1 influenza virus</category><category>Hamburg</category><category>Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee</category><category>Senate committee</category><category>U.S. Senate</category><category>Upcoming Events</category><category>associated press</category><category>committee</category><category>confirmation</category><category>confirmation hearing</category><category>fda</category><category>flu</category><category>food</category><category>food safety</category><category>hearing</category><category>influenza</category><category>margaret hamburg</category><category>safety</category><category>senate</category><category>virus</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:30:59 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Secretary of Agriculture Emphasizes Safety of U.S. Pork</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Secretary of <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome"><font color="#800080">Agriculture</font></a> <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&amp;contentid=bios_vilsack.xml"><font color="#800080">Tom Vilsack</font></a> issued a statement today emphasizing that U.S. pork products are safe and that there is no evidence that U.S. swine have been infected with the swine flu virus.<br />
<br />
Calling trade restrictions on pork or pork products unnecessary, Vilsack said any such restrictions would be inconsistent with World Organization for Animal Health guidelines.&nbsp;&ldquo;[I]t is not necessary to introduce specific measures for international trade in swine or their products, nor are consumers of pork products at risk of infection,&rdquo; Vilsack said.&nbsp;The complete statement is available <a href="http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&amp;contentid=2009/04/0137.xml"><font color="#800080">here</font></a>.<br />
<br />
A report in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/world/asia/29swine.html?hp"><font color="#800080">The New York Times</font></a> notes that pork producers are questioning whether it is appropriate to call the virus &ldquo;swine flu&rdquo; given that there is no evidence of swine infection.&nbsp;The report states that officials in Thailand, one of the world&rsquo;s largest meat exporters, have started calling the virus &ldquo;Mexican flu.&rdquo; &nbsp;An Israeli deputy health minister reportedly said Israel would follow suit to keep Jews from having to say the word &ldquo;swine.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/secretary-of-agriculture-emphasizes-safety-of-us-pork/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/secretary-of-agriculture-emphasizes-safety-of-us-pork/</guid>
<category>Department of Agriculture</category><category>Israel</category><category>Mexico</category><category>New York Times</category><category>Outbreaks</category><category>Secretary of Agriculture</category><category>Thailand</category><category>Tom Vilsack</category><category>USDA</category><category>Vilsack</category><category>World Organization for Animal Health</category><category>flu</category><category>infection</category><category>influenza</category><category>pork</category><category>pork producers</category><category>pork products</category><category>producers</category><category>swine</category><category>swine flu</category><category>virus</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Pork Producers Feel Effects of Swine Flu</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" hspace="5" align="right" style="width: 265px; height: 181px" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/Swine.jpg" />Pork producers are feeling the effects of the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/"><font color="#800080">swine flu</font></a> as the number of reported cases of the virus increases.&nbsp; Stock prices for Virginia-based <a href="http://www.smithfield.com/"><font color="#800080">Smithfield Foods</font></a>, the world&rsquo;s largest pork processor, and Arkansas-based <a href="http://www.tyson.com/"><font color="#800080">Tyson Foods</font></a>, fell 12 percent and 9 percent today, respectively.&nbsp; The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/">Wall Street Journal</a> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124084714145559633.html"><font color="#800080">reports</font></a> that the prices of hogs, corn, and soybeans also dropped today.&nbsp; About 16 percent of U.S. pork exports have been shipped to Mexico over the past year &ndash; a country where so far <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/27/AR2009042702017.html"><font color="#800080">149 people have died from the swine flu</font></a>.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</a> and other health officials have emphasized that <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/key_facts.htm"><font color="#800080">swine flu viruses are not transmitted by food</font></a> and people cannot contract the virus by eating pork or pork products.&nbsp; That fact alone does not seem to be enough to quell consumers&rsquo; fears.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Swine-flu-hits-Smithfield-Tyson/story.aspx?guid=%7BDC71C4DC-F9CB-4963-8FC9-0CA495CB0D9C%7D"><font color="#800080">MarketWatch</font></a> earlier today quoted a pork industry analyst as saying the industry wants to avoid a slip of exports and prices akin to the 2003 avian flu outbreak in Asia.&nbsp; Analyst Heather Jones said she believes the pork industry &ldquo;needs to undertake an aggressive and widespread informational marketing campaign.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ggU2Zaio953uLnxIul8kViVdECsQD97R14L80"><font color="#800080">Associated Press</font></a> is reporting that Seattle-based <a href="http://www.starbucks.com/"><font color="#800080">Starbucks Corp.</font></a> announced today that it is closing 10 of its Mexico City cafes in response to the swine flu outbreak and pursuant to instructions from the Mexican government.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/pork-producers-feel-effects-of-swine-flu/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/pork-producers-feel-effects-of-swine-flu/</guid>
<category>Arkansas</category><category>Asia</category><category>CDC</category><category>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</category><category>Crisis Management</category><category>MarketWatch</category><category>Mexican government</category><category>Mexico</category><category>Mexico City</category><category>Smithfield</category><category>Smithfield Foods</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>Starbucks Corp.</category><category>Tyson</category><category>Tyson Foods</category><category>Virginia</category><category>ap</category><category>associated press</category><category>avian flu</category><category>cafe</category><category>government</category><category>outbreak</category><category>pork</category><category>producer</category><category>producers</category><category>swine flu</category><category>virus</category><category>wall street journal</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:39:07 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Michigan Company Announces Frozen Pasta Recall</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A Michigan maker of frozen pasta products has issued a recall for products that were distributed to seven states.&nbsp;Canton, Mich.-based <a href="http://www.mamamuccispasta.com/"><font color="#800080">Mucci Food Products</font></a> is recalling an undetermined amount of frozen meat and poultry pasta products because the food was prepared without federal inspection.<br />
<br />
The products were produced from May 1, 2008 to April 24, 2009 and distributed to California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio.&nbsp;The recalled products bear the establishment number &ldquo;19177&rdquo; or &ldquo;P-19177&rdquo; inside the USDA mark of inspection and the dates &ldquo;1218&rdquo; to &ldquo;1149&rdquo; located at the bottom of the product box.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.fsis.usda.gov/About_FSIS/index.asp"><font color="#800080">U.S. Department of Agriculture&rsquo;s Food Safety and Inspection Service</font></a> has <a href="http://www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&amp;_Events/Recall_017_2009_Release/index.asp"><font color="#800080">complete details of the products subject to the recall</font></a>, including images of the product labels.&nbsp;The USDA has not received any reports of illness as a result of consumption of the products.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/michigan-company-announces-frozen-pasta-recall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/michigan-company-announces-frozen-pasta-recall/</guid>
<category>Crisis Management</category><category>FSIS</category><category>Michigan</category><category>Mucci Food Products</category><category>U.S. Department of Agriculture</category><category>USDA</category><category>food safety and inspection service</category><category>frozen pasta</category><category>inspection</category><category>meat</category><category>pasta</category><category>poultry</category><category>recall</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:01:07 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>FDA and CDC Warn of Salmonella in Raw Sprouts</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" hspace="5" align="left" style="width: 141px; height: 154px" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/alfalfasprouts.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</font></a> and the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/"><font color="#800080">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</font></a> are recommending against eating raw <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfalfa"><font color="#800080">alfalfa</font></a> sprouts because of potential <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/"><font color="#800080">salmonella</font></a> contamination.<br />
<br />
According to the FDA, the salmonella contamination appears to be in seeds for alfalfa sprouts.&nbsp;As of yesterday, 31 cases of illness with Salmonella Saintpaul have been reported to the CDC.&nbsp;The reported cases are in Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, and West Virginia.&nbsp;The FDA cautions that the number of infected people may rise because some illnesses have not yet been confirmed with laboratory testing.<br />
<br />
The FDA believes this outbreak may be linked to an outbreak from earlier this year.&nbsp;Its initial investigation traces the contaminated raw alfalfa sprouts to multiple sprout growers in multiple states.&nbsp;Additional details are available <a href="http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2009/NEW02001.html"><font color="#800080">here</font></a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/fda-and-cdc-warn-of-salmonella-in-raw-sprouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/fda-and-cdc-warn-of-salmonella-in-raw-sprouts/</guid>
<category>CDC</category><category>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Outbreaks</category><category>Salmonella Saintpaul</category><category>alfalfa</category><category>alfalfa sprouts</category><category>centers for disease control</category><category>contamination</category><category>fda</category><category>growers</category><category>infection</category><category>outbreak</category><category>raw alfalfa sprouts</category><category>saintpaul</category><category>salmonella</category><category>sprouts</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:44:59 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>NY Senator to Propose Director of Food Safety Oversight</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://schumer.senate.gov/"><font color="#800080">Senator Charles Schumer</font></a> (D-NY) is expected to introduce legislation today to strengthen U.S. food safety.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.newsday.com/"><font color="#800080">Newsday.com</font></a> is <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/state/ny-lifood2312683140apr22,0,3760869.story"><font color="#800080">reporting</font></a> that Sen. Schumer&rsquo;s bill will call for a director of food safety oversight who would be a senior-level director at the <a href="http://www.commerce.gov/"><font color="#800080">Department of Commerce</font></a>.&nbsp;The proposed director would focus exclusively on food safety.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/legislation-2/ny-senator-to-propose-director-of-food-safety-oversight/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/legislation-2/ny-senator-to-propose-director-of-food-safety-oversight/</guid>
<category>Charles Schumer</category><category>Department of Commerce</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Schumer</category><category>Senator Charles Schumer</category><category>U.S. Senate</category><category>bill</category><category>food safety</category><category>oversight</category><category>senate</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:46:37 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Kellogg Co. Agrees to Settle False Advertising Claims</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img height="200" alt="" hspace="8" width="200" align="left" border="0" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/FrostedMiniWheats_Cereal.jpg" />Cereal maker <a href="http://www2.kelloggs.com/"><font color="#800080">Kellogg Company</font></a> has entered into a <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823145/090420kelloggagree.pdf"><font color="#800080">consent agreement</font></a> with the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Federal Trade Commission</font></a> to settle charges that certain Kellogg advertisements contain false or misleading statements.<br />
<br />
At issue in the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823145/090420kelloggcmpt.pdf"><font color="#800080">FTC&rsquo;s complaint</font></a> are statements from Kellogg&rsquo;s advertising that eating a bowl of Kellogg&rsquo;s <a href="http://fmw.kelloggcompany.com/"><font color="#800080">Frosted Mini-Wheats cereal</font></a> for breakfast is clinically shown to improve kids&rsquo; attentiveness by nearly 20 percent.&nbsp;The complaint also challenges a separate advertising claim that eating Frosted Mini-Wheats for breakfast was clinically shown to improve children&rsquo;s attentiveness by nearly 20 percent when compared to children who ate no breakfast.&nbsp;The complaint alleges that both of the challenged claims are false and violate the <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/FTC_Act_IncorporatingUS_SAFE_WEB_Act.pdf"><font color="#800080">Federal Trade Commission Act</font></a>.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823145/090420kelloggagree.pdf"><font color="#800080">proposed settlement</font></a> would, among other things, bar Kellogg from making comparable claims about Frosted Mini-Wheats unless the claims are true and not misleading.&nbsp;The consent agreement will be subject to public comment through May 19, 2009.&nbsp;The FTC will then decide whether to make the agreement final.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/litigation-2/kellogg-co-agrees-to-settle-false-advertising-claims/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/litigation-2/kellogg-co-agrees-to-settle-false-advertising-claims/</guid>
<category>FTC</category><category>Federal Trade Commission</category><category>Frosted Mini-Wheats</category><category>Kellogg</category><category>Kellogg Company</category><category>Kellogg&apos;s</category><category>Litigation</category><category>U.S. Federal Trade Commission</category><category>advertising</category><category>cereal</category><category>consent agreement</category><category>false</category><category>misleading</category><category>settlement</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:38:32 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Update: Supreme Court Declines Review of Methylmercury Case With Potential Preemption Implications</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>An update to a <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/01/articles/preemption-1/supreme-court-asked-to-hear-preemption-case-involving-methylmercury-fda-issues-draft-documents-regarding-consuming-commercial-fish/"><font color="#800080">case we&rsquo;ve been following</font></a>: the <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Supreme Court</font></a> has refused to review a decision by the <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit</font></a> involving state-law claims over <a href="http://toxics.usgs.gov/definitions/methylmercury.html"><font color="#800080">methylmercury</font></a> content in canned tuna.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/042009zor.pdf"><font color="#800080">Supreme Court&rsquo;s order</font></a> in <i>Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC v. Fellner</i> leaves in place the <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/071238p.pdf"><font color="#800080">Third Circuit&rsquo;s ruling</font></a> that allowed the plaintiff to sue the maker of <a href="http://www.chickenofthesea.com/"><font color="#800080">Chicken of the Sea</font></a> products over methylmercury poisoning she allegedly suffered after consuming canned tuna almost exclusively for five years.<br />
<br />
In its <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/Tri-Union%20Seafoods%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Certiorari.pdf"><font color="#800080">petition</font></a> for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari"><font color="#800080">writ of certiorari</font></a>, <a href="http://www.chickenofthesea.com/company.aspx"><font color="#800080">Tri-Union Seafoods</font></a> argued that the Supreme Court should review the case to determine, among other things, whether regulatory actions by the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/"><font color="#800080">U.S. Food and Drug Administration</font></a> and the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/fdcact/fdctoc.htm"><font color="#800080">Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act</font></a> preempt state-law claims based on a failure to warn of the risks of methylmercury in tuna products.&nbsp;The Supreme Court declined to review the case without comment.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/litigation-2/update-supreme-court-declines-review-of-methylmercury-case-with-potential-preemption-implications/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/litigation-2/update-supreme-court-declines-review-of-methylmercury-case-with-potential-preemption-implications/</guid>
<category>Certiorari</category><category>Chicken of the Sea</category><category>Fellner</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act</category><category>Litigation</category><category>Methylmercury</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>Third Circuit</category><category>U.S. Supreme Court</category><category>canned tuna</category><category>fda</category><category>petition</category><category>tri-union seafoods</category><category>tuna</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>FDA Seeks Input on Intentional Adulteration of Products</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food and Drug Administration</a> has announced an effort to explore the intentional adulteration of products to increase a producer&rsquo;s bottom line.&nbsp;So-called &ldquo;economically motivated adulteration,&rdquo; or EMA, is the topic of an FDA-sponsored public meeting to be held on May 1 in College Park, Maryland.<br />
<br />
The meeting follows last year&rsquo;s concerns about products tainted with <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2008/11/articles/crisis-management/preparation-for-melamine-issues-updating-crisis-management-plans-and-insurance-coverage/"><font color="#800080">melamine</font></a> and other incidents of concern to public health.&nbsp;For purposes of the meeting, the FDA proposes to define EMA as &ldquo;the fraudulent, intentional substitution or addition of a substance in a product for the purpose of increasing the apparent value of the product or reducing the cost of its production, <i>i.e.</i>, for economic gain.&rdquo;&nbsp;The FDA hopes to raise awareness about EMA and receive input regarding how industry and regulators can predict, prevent, and address EMA.<br />
<br />
Full details regarding the meeting can be found in the <a href="http://frwebgate6.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=631258201686+1+2+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve"><font color="#800080">Federal Register</font></a>.</span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/fda-seeks-input-on-intentional-adulteration-of-products/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/crisis-management/fda-seeks-input-on-intentional-adulteration-of-products/</guid>
<category>Crisis Management</category><category>EMA</category><category>Federal Register</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Melamine</category><category>economically motivated adulteration</category><category>fda</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:15:09 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>California Lawmakers Announce Proposed Food-Safety Reforms in Wake of Pistachio Recalls</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As pistachio recalls <a href="http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/04/02/More_US_pistachio_nut_recalls_announced/UPI-41701238676254/">continue to be announced</a> in the wake of <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/outbreaks/the-pistachio-recall-more-salmonella/">salmonella-tainted pistachios</a> from <a href="http://www.settonfarms.com/">Setton Farms</a>, two California lawmakers this week announced legislation that is expected to strengthen food-safety standards in that state.<br />
<br />
The bill to be introduced in the <a href="http://www.assembly.ca.gov/defaulttext.asp">California State Assembly</a> by <a href="http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/Speaker/">Assembly Speaker Karen Bass</a> and <a href="http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a42/">Assemblyman Mike Feuer</a> is expected to require detailed safety plans from food processors, periodic testing of food at California food processing facilities, and requirements for food processors to report to state authorities any positive tests for a dangerous contaminant within 24 hours.<br />
<br />
A video of Assemblyman Mike Feuer&rsquo;s announcement is available below.&nbsp; Meanwhile, the FDA continues to update its <a href="http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/pistachiorecall/index.cfm">list of recalled products</a>.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<object width="445" height="364">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mt6tHI8xK8A&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed width="445" height="364" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mt6tHI8xK8A&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;border=1"></embed></object>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/california-lawmakers-announce-proposed-foodsafety-reforms-in-wake-of-pistachio-recalls/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/04/articles/outbreaks/california-lawmakers-announce-proposed-foodsafety-reforms-in-wake-of-pistachio-recalls/</guid>
<category>California</category><category>California State Assembly</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Karen Bass</category><category>Mike Feuer</category><category>Outbreaks</category><category>fda</category><category>food safety</category><category>pistachio</category><category>recall</category><category>reporting</category><category>safety</category><category>safety plan</category><category>salmonella</category><category>setton farms</category><category>testing</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:40:18 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Georgia House Unanimously Passes Food Safety Bill; Kellogg CEO Calls for Food Safety Reforms</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Update to today&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/georgia-is-one-step-closer-to-tough-new-food-safety-law/"><font color="#800080">earlier post</font></a>: the <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/house/index.htm"><font color="#800080">Georgia House of Representatives</font></a> unanimously passed a <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/sum/sb80.htm"><font color="#800080">bill</font></a> today that would strengthen food safety laws in Georgia.&nbsp;The <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/house/index.htm"><font color="#800080">Georgia House</font></a> and <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/senate/index.htm"><font color="#800080">Senate</font></a> now will resolve minor differences in the proposed legislation and send a final version to <a href="http://gov.georgia.gov/02/gov/home/0,2218,78006749,00.html"><font color="#800080">Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue</font></a> for his signature.<br />
<br />
Also today, the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jeLgwCG-FEEYH8KZ7Tt45zOdSIKgD970MV982"><font color="#800080">AP reports</font></a> that the chief executive of <a href="http://www2.kelloggs.com/"><font color="#800080">Kellogg Co.</font></a> is urging food safety reforms, including written safety plans for all food companies and annual inspections of facilities that make &ldquo;high-risk foods.&rdquo;&nbsp;The AP article notes Kellogg lost $70 million worth of peanut products in the recent <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/02/articles/outbreaks/fdas-searchable-widget-for-peanut-product-recall/"><font color="#800080">salmonella outbreak</font></a> linked to <a href="http://www.peanutcorp.com/"><font color="#800080">Peanut Corporation of America</font></a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/georgia-house-unanimously-passes-food-safety-bill-kellogg-ceo-calls-for-food-safety-reforms/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/georgia-house-unanimously-passes-food-safety-bill-kellogg-ceo-calls-for-food-safety-reforms/</guid>
<category>Kellogg</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Outbreaks</category><category>ap</category><category>associated press</category><category>food safety</category><category>georgia</category><category>georgia governor</category><category>georgia house of representatives</category><category>georgia senate</category><category>inspection</category><category>outbreak</category><category>peanut corporation of america</category><category>safety</category><category>salmonella</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:02:29 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Georgia is One Step Closer to Tough New Food Safety Law</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/house/index.htm"><font color="#800080">Georgia House of Representatives</font></a> today considers proposed legislation to strengthen food safety rules in that state.&nbsp; Among other things, <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/sum/sb80.htm"><font color="#800080">Senate Bill 80</font></a> includes a provision that would require food makers to alert state inspectors within 24 hours if a plant&rsquo;s&nbsp;internal tests show products are tainted.&nbsp; Experts say no other state has such a rule.<br />
<br />
The bill already has passed the <a href="http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/senate/index.htm"><font color="#800080">Georgia Senate</font></a>.&nbsp; House approval would mean <a href="http://gov.georgia.gov/02/gov/home/0,2218,78006749,00.html"><font color="#800080">Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue</font></a> soon could sign the bill into law.<br />
<br />
The bill was introduced following the <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/02/articles/outbreaks/fdas-searchable-widget-for-peanut-product-recall/"><font color="#800080">salmonella outbreak</font></a> linked to <a href="http://www.peanutcorp.com/"><font color="#800080">Peanut Corporation of America</font></a>.&nbsp; Investigators say the company knowingly shipped salmonella-laced products even after PCA's internal tests showed the products were tainted.&nbsp; State law did not require the company to share those test results.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/georgia-is-one-step-closer-to-tough-new-food-safety-law/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/georgia-is-one-step-closer-to-tough-new-food-safety-law/</guid>
<category>Legislation</category><category>food safety</category><category>georgia</category><category>georgia governor</category><category>georgia house of representatives</category><category>georgia senate</category><category>peanut</category><category>peanut corporation of america</category><category>salmonella</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:48:11 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>California Appeals Court: No Mercury Warnings Required on Canned Tuna</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><img height="210" alt="" hspace="10" width="300" align="right" border="2" src="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/image/Tuna Picture(1).jpg" />The <a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/courtsofappeal/1stDistrict/"><font color="#800080">California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District</font></a> has upheld a trial court ruling that canned tuna sold in California need not warn consumers about <a href="http://toxics.usgs.gov/definitions/methylmercury.html"><font color="#800080">methylmercury</font></a>.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">In 2004, the State of California sued three tuna companies: <a href="http://www.chickenofthesea.com/company.aspx"><font color="#800080">Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC</font></a>; <a href="http://www.delmonte.com/"><font color="#800080">Del Monte Corporation</font></a>; and <a href="http://www.bumblebee.com/"><font color="#800080">Bumble Bee Foods, LLC</font></a>.&nbsp;The state argued, among other things, that California&rsquo;s <a href="http://oehha.ca.gov/Prop65.html"><font color="#800080">Proposition 65</font></a> requires the companies to provide warnings to pregnant women and women of childbearing age that the canned tuna the companies distribute and sell contains trace amounts of methylmercury, a chemical that can cause harm to a developing fetus.&nbsp;After a six-week trial in 2006, the lower court ruled against the state, holding that (i) Proposition 65 was preempted because it conflicts with federal law, (ii) the amount of methylmercury in canned tuna does not rise to the threshold level that would require a warning on the product, and (iii) the tuna companies are exempt from Proposition 65&rsquo;s warning requirements because virtually all methylmercury is &ldquo;naturally occurring.&rdquo;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">The state appealed, and the appellate court recently issued a <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/Cal App - State v Tri Union Seafoods - 03112009.pdf">decision</a> upholding the tuna companies&rsquo; victory on the sole basis that substantial evidence supported the trial court&rsquo;s finding that methylmercury is naturally occurring in canned tuna.&nbsp;Proposition 65 contains several exemptions to its warning requirements, one of which provides that there is no duty to warn if a chemical is naturally occurring in food.&nbsp;Significantly, the appellate court did not address the preemption or threshold level findings of the trial court.&nbsp;The court also posited scenarios that could lead to a renewed Proposition 65 claim against the tuna companies (see page 28 of the <a href="http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/uploads/file/Cal App - State v Tri Union Seafoods - 03112009.pdf">decision</a>).</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">No word yet on whether the state plans to appeal to the <a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/"><font color="#800080">California Supreme Court</font></a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/litigation-2/california-appeals-court-no-mercury-warnings-required-on-canned-tuna/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/litigation-2/california-appeals-court-no-mercury-warnings-required-on-canned-tuna/</guid>
<category>Litigation</category><category>Methylmercury</category><category>Preemption</category><category>bumble bee foods</category><category>california court of appeal</category><category>california court of appeal for the first appellate district</category><category>california supreme court</category><category>canned tuna</category><category>del monte corporation</category><category>duty to warn</category><category>labeling</category><category>mercury</category><category>proposition 65</category><category>state of california</category><category>tri-union seafoods</category><category>tuna</category><category>warnings</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:20:41 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>

</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Administration Focuses on Food Safety</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt">The <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/"><font color="#800080">Obama administration</font></a> placed food safety front and center over the weekend.&nbsp;In his weekly radio address, President Obama on Saturday announced new leadership at the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/"><font color="#800080">Food and Drug Administration</font></a> and the creation of a panel to toughen food safety laws.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 10pt">Characterizing outdated food safety laws and the lack of resources at the FDA as &ldquo;a hazard to public health,&rdquo; Mr. Obama announced the appointment of <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/changingthefaceofmedicine/physicians/biography_136.html"><font color="#800080">Dr. Margaret Hamburg</font></a>, a former New York City health commissioner, as FDA commissioner, and Baltimore Health Commissioner <a href="http://www.baltimorehealth.org/commissioner.html"><font color="#800080">Dr. Joshua Sharfstein</font></a> as the FDA principal deputy commissioner.&nbsp;The president also unveiled the Food Safety Working Group &ndash; a group that will consist of cabinet secretaries and senior officials to advise the president on how to update and enforce food safety laws.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 10pt">President Obama also announced two additional food-safety steps on Saturday: closing a loophole in federal regulation that allows some diseased cows to be slaughtered for food, and a billion-dollar investment to modernize labs and increase the number of food inspectors.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 10pt">Read a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Weekly-Address-President-Barack-Obama-Announces-Key-FDA-Appointments-and-Tougher-Food-Safety-Measures/"><font color="#800080">transcript</font></a> of the president&rsquo;s weekly radio address, download the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/WeeklyAddress/Audio/2009/03/20090314-NXWRSP/20090314_Weekly_Address.mp3"><font color="#800080">.mp3 audio</font></a>, or view the video below.</span><br />
<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<object height="344" width="425">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkKp02lluq8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" name="movie" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" />
<param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkKp02lluq8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></embed></object>]]></description>
<link>http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/obama-administration-focuses-on-food-safety/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodliabilitylaw.com/2009/03/articles/legislation-2/obama-administration-focuses-on-food-safety/</guid>
<category>Cow</category><category>Disease</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Obama</category><category>commissioner</category><category>cows</category><category>fda</category><category>food inspectors</category><category>food safety</category><category>food safety laws</category><category>food safety working group</category><category>inspectors</category><category>joshua sharfstein</category><category>laboratories</category><category>labs</category><category>law</category><category>laws</category><category>margaret hamburg</category><category>obama administration</category><category>president</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>safety inspectors</category><category>slaughtered</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
<author>bjanderson@stoel.com (Bryan Anderson)</author>
<enclosure url="http://www.whitehouse.gov/WeeklyAddress/Audio/2009/03/20090314-NXWRSP/20090314_Weekly_Address.mp3" length="5327632" type="audio/mpeg" />
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
