The Ninth Circuit ruled that there is no remedy available for an alleged misinterpretation of the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1958 to exclude poultry from its scope. And a plaintiff who sued only under that statute could not force the Secretary of Agriculture to make an interpretation under a different statute, the Federal Meat Inspection Act, that poultry were an "amenable species" to be placed under the slaughter provisions of that completely separate law. Thus, plaintiffs lacked standing to pursue a claim in federal court.… Continue Reading